Wiki-2: Is the Paraiso movement involved in violent activities?

NO

List of wiki edit providing evidence

• # (cur) (last) 23:33, 2 September 2006 VictoriaV (Talk | contribs) m (89,897 bytes) (Reverted to revision xxxxxxxxx by Amado; you. are. trying. to. violate. WP:NPOV. no. way.. using TW)
• # (cur) (last) 23:30, 2 September 2006 Rm99 (Talk | contribs) (92,006 bytes) (stop deleting cited content.)
• # (cur) (last) 23:19, 2 September 2006 Amado (Talk | contribs) (89,897 bytes) (Stop your POV pushing Rm99!!!!)
• # (cur) (last) 23:13, 2 September 2006 Rm99 (Talk | contribs) (92,006 bytes) (restored article defaced by cult vandalism)
• # (cur) (last) 23:04, 2 September 2006 Amado (Talk | contribs) (89,897 bytes) (More POV pushing in the lead, one sided. Stop it!!!!)
• # (cur) (last) 22:52, 2 September 2006 Rm99 (Talk | contribs) (92,006 bytes) (restored version prior to cult vandalism)
• # (cur) (last) 19:38, 2 September 2006 VictoriaV (Talk | contribs) (89,897 bytes) (yawn, POV pushing)

Even in edit warring (such as above example), there no evidence of violent activities. Just edit skirmishes.

• # (cur) (last) 01:16, 2 September 2006 Alejo (Talk | contribs) (22 bytes) (?Replaced page with 'Image:Penis[1].jpg')

This is obnoxious page vandalism, but not a sign of violent activities. Also, page vandalism came from those “against,” as well as those “for” the movement (Alejo, here, is against the movement).

Short Answer:

This Wiki edit data does not provide any evidence of violent activities by Paraiso supporters. To reach this conclusion, we ran keyword searches in the Wiki edits, looking for hints of violent activities. Keywords:

• violent/violence
• kill
• death
• beat
• protest
• attack

None of these yielded indications of violent activities.

Figure 1. Keyword search for “attack”

Using our dimensions of major players (Wiki-1 detailed answer), we manually looked at edits and comments provided by the players we ranked as +1 or +2 as “belligerent” and +1 or +2 as “for” the movement. No one showed indications of violent activities. Edit skirmishes, page vandalism, yes. Violent activities, no.

Finally, we manually re-scanned all edit-comments, again finding nothing notable in the Wiki edit data alone.

Our one caveat is, had we outside context, we would like to explore the “Miami lectures” referenced by Amado (edit-comment, 9/28/06), to see if these related to violent activities.

Figure 2. Amado’s edit-comment, 9/28/06

Back to Homepage